Search for: "Regina"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
Regina v Thompson, Regina v Crawford, Regina v Gomulu, Regina v Allen, Regina v Blake, Regina v Kasunga; [2010] EWCA Crim 1623; [2010] WLR (D) 183 “The collective responsibility of the jury was not confined to the verdict. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:34 am
Regina v Saw; Regina v Tete-Djawu; Regina v Smith (Martin); Regina v Kassa; Regina v Younis; Regina v McPhee Court of Appeal “When sentencing defendants for domestic burglary, the judge should have in mind the impact of the offence on the victim, as well as the culpability of the defendant. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:15 am
Regina v Sherif; Regina v Ali (Siraj); Regina v Ali (Muhedin); Regina v Mohamed; Regina v Abdurahman; Regina v Abdullahi Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The seriousness of terrorist activity about which a defendant failed to give information, rather than the extent of the information that could have been provided, was what determined the level of criminality [...] [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Regina v Horncastle; Regina v Blackmore; Regina v Marquis; Regina v Graham; Regina v Carter Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A criminal trial could be fair although the defence did not have the opportunity of examining every prosecution witness. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 10:08 am
Regina v Herbert, Regina v Harris, Regina v Hulme (Joseph), Regina v Hulme (Danny) and Regina v Mallett Court of Appeal “Even a definitive sentencing guideline was not to be used or approached as if each offence could be put into a fixed and inflexible compartment. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:18 am
C; Regina v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:35 am
Regina v Zafar; Regina v Malik; Regina v Raja; Regina v Iqbal; Regina v Butt Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A person possessed an article for terrorist purposes only if he possessed it in circumstances which gave rise to a reasonable suspicion that he intended it to be used for the purpose of the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Regina v Khan (Bakish Alla); Regina v Hanif Regina v Lewthwaite; Regina v Khan (Michael Arshad); Regina v Cross Regina v Hill Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “It was essential that trial judges should be aware at the stage of jury selection if any potential juror was, or had been a police officer or a member of the prosecuting authority or was a serving prison officer. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:50 am
M; Regina v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:48 am
Regina v White; Regina v Dennard; Regina v Perry; Regina v Rowbotham [2010] EWCA Crim 978; [2010] WLR (D) 120 “For the purposes of tobacco smuggling cases there was unlikely to be any incompatibility between the rules which made those liable under the Excise Goods (Holding, Movement, Warehousing and REDS) Regulations 1992 or the Tobacco Products Regulations 2001 to pay duty and those made liable by Council Directive 92/12/EEC. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:36 am
Regina v Mehta; Regina v Sharman; Regina v Reardon; Regina v Ratcliff Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Money-launderers who offered a service to numerous criminals via bureaux de change or hawala banking were often as culpable as the criminals generating the money, if not more so, and often more culpable than those who handled the proceeds of a particular fraud. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:11 am
Regina v N; Regina v D; Regina v L Court of Appeal “The drafting of an indictment required close attention to the realities of the case and none at all to the theoretical legal possibilities which might arise. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:32 am
Regina v Twomey (John); Regina v Blake (Peter); Regina v Cameron (Glen); Regina v Hibberd (Barry) Court of Appeal “A defendant's right to a fair trial was not prejudiced by holding a criminal trial without a jury, where the danger of jury tampering was very significant and was not sufficiently addressed by proposed protective measures. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:53 am
Regina v Maina; Regina v Saddique; Regina v Kika Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The use of a knife to commit murder was a factor that aggravated the seriousness of that offence for the purpose of sentencing. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
Regina v Gill; Regina v Eccles; Regina v Abu-Neigh (formerly Wallace) [2011] EWCA Crim 2795; [2011] WLR (D) 344 “Where a defendant was sentenced to a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment and the minimum term was to be determined pursuant to paragraphs 3 or 6 of Schedule 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (which related to transitional cases) a reduction in the length of the minimum term could take account of exceptional progress made by the defendant whilst in… [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:43 am
Regina v Stannard; Regina v A; Regina v Clarkson Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a defendant was before the court to be sentenced for offences committed both before and after April 4, 2005, when the dangerous offender provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 came into force, distinct statutory provisions applied but that did not [...] [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:17 am
Regina v M(L) and Others; Regina v Tabot; Regina v Tijani [2010] EWCA Crim 2327 ; [2010] WLR(D) 266 “Where a person was a victim of human trafficking, for the purposes of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (CETS No 197), and whilst retaining some nexus with the trafficking committed an offence which arguably called, in the public interest, for prosecution, the decision whether to prosecute depended on whether the offence… [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:53 am
Regina v Khan Regina v Lockett; Regina v Carrington Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Confiscation orders made under old regulations in tobacco-smuggling cases had to be quashed because the prosecuting authority had overlooked the fact that new regulations had narrowed the categories of persons liable to pay excise duty. [read post]
16 May 2007, 4:46 am
IK; Regina v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:19 am
Regina v Hills; Regina v Pomfret; Regina v Davies Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A consecutive prison sentence could be added to a life sentence where the circumstances warranted it. [read post]
